What do power, alcohol and anonymity all have in common?

One of the things I like about behavioural economics is its insistence that you look at the context in which people act rather than just their ‘attitudes’ (which aren’t consistent anyway).  This articles makes an interesting comparison between power, alcohol and anonymity, they can all make us swing between altruistic and unethical behaviour.  This fits in nicely with some of the research we’ve been conducting in labs looking at how people under different temporary states (such as hunger) answer questionnaires differently.  When answering questionnaires people do so anonymously, but when they’re buying products in the shop they do so publically, what impact could this have?  What if people answered questionnaires publically?

Understanding how people feel when making purchase decisions – e.g. do they feel empowered – and what triggers these feelings, could point towards interesting insights.

http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-06-23/man-woman/29694322_1_kellogg-statement-adam-galinsky-kellogg-school

 

Advertisements

Go on, tell us how you feel!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s